Tuesday, 5 October 2010
Can you afford to live till 99???

Sunday, 30 May 2010
Need for Savings
- You are not going to
- Live forever
- Stay healthy forever
- Work forever
- Some day, you'll retire and in all probability, you'll live for a few years after that. Today's life expectancy for reasonably healthy upper middle class folks is well beyond 80, and I don't expect you to work for much beyond 65
- Your accumulated savings should keep you and your dependents going for at least 20 years after retirement. And remember, there is a good chance that your dependent may end up outliving you by 5-10 years!!! Look around you.
- There are blocks of "Big Expenses" waiting for you in the years to come
- Higher education of kids
- Marriage of kids
- At least 2 foreign holidays for the family per decade
- At least 6 instances of multi-day hospitalisation per decade
- You will not enjoy the idea of being a "dependent" on anyone, especially if you're used to "being the boss" and the "hand that brings the bread" all your life. Certainly, you'll not relish being financially dependent. And God forbid, what if you outlive people on whom you may be forced to be dependent, financially or otherwise????
- You have a better standard of living today than you did around 10 years ago, 5 years ago, perhaps even in comparison to a year back. And you'll be keen on improving your standard of living in the years to come. It costs money. Just tell your dad or grandma about the price of 1 KG of your favourite vegetable or a gram of Gold or a square feet of land or your last restaurant bill and look at the looks on their faces - That will be your response for every item of expense 10 years later, 15 years later.
- Don't believe a word of the public claims of inflation in the business papers - While they talk about 5-10% per annum, you know better. Things that you MUST BUY like rice, dal, tooth paste, shaving cream, shampoos, shoes, shirts, petrol, movie tickets, sanitary napkins, undergarments, broomsticks, floor cleaners, etc. are all becoming costlier at rates northwards of 15-20% per annum. Things that are becoming cheaper due to technological advancements like TVs, Laptops, Mobile Phones, Cameras, etc. need to be replaced ever more frequently as they become outdated. Even yester-year "once in a life time purchases" like cars are being replaced as frequently as twice a decade. All of this cost money. And loads of money. And I've not even spoken a word about so-called luxuries like jewellery, costly parties, etc.
- How much should I save?
- How should I save?
- What should I do with my savings?
- Should I never take loans? Or is it OK to take some loans?
- How should I invest my savings?
- What is the meaning of
- Financial Planning
- Asset allocation
- Fiscal Prudence
- Risk Pyramid
- Risk-adjusted returns
- Inflation-beating returns

Wednesday, 4 November 2009
Power of Trading
Power of Trading
Many people misunderstand the concept of
- Long-term investing - To mean that one should sell only when one needs the money
- Asset Allocation - To mean that one should have a by-and-large-fixed proportion of surplus money to be invested in different asset classes at any given life situation (age, number of kids, etc.)
Both the above are completely wrong. I'll explain in greater detail in later posts.
In this post, I'm going to share with you hypothetical figures of the difference that one can make with
- Periodic trading, ie., periodically booking profits and re-entering at lower levels
- Slightly higher levels of returns by allocating a larger share in riskier asset classes.
Take a look at this table:
Power of Trading, rather than holding long-term! Wonder if it is feasible??? | Initial Amount Invested | Annual Return | No. of Years | Final Value of Investment | |
| | | | | |
| Impact of buying shares at just 3% lower cost and trading periodically so as to get just a 2% additional return annually | 97,000 | 1.20 | 10 | 600,598 |
| 100,000 | 1.18 | 10 | 523,384 | |
| | | | | |
| 97,000 | 1.14 | 10 | 359,600 | |
| 100,000 | 1.12 | 10 | 310,585 |
You'll realise something that ought to be obvious:
- A 6% higher return can mean an enormous difference to your portfolio value at the end of a decade. Hence, do ensure that you allocate a higher proportion of your disposable surplus in riskier asset classes like equity if you are looking at the long term
- A strategy that involves periodical profit booking and re-entering at marginally lower levels has quite a significant impact on your portfolio value at the end of a decade. Hence, make it a point to book profits regularly. This will also ensure that you
- Review your portfolio regularly
- Cut your losses from unintended dud investments far more quickly
-
Think about it!
And Act!
Regards,
N

Thursday, 29 October 2009
World Thrift Day - Why ALL of us Ought to invest in Equity
World Thrift Day - Why ALL of us Ought to invest in Equity
Dear Friends,
Wishing you all a very happy "WORLD THRIFT DAY" - Apparently, it is celebrated on October 30th!
To me, every day is a Thrift Day.
On this occasion, I'd like to make a preposterous suggestion: All of us MUST invest in Equity (either directly or through mutual funds - at least through Nifty BEES). Many may be aghast at this suggestion, saying that Equity is not appropriate for anyone who can't afford to take a risk.
However, I differ.
Take a look at the following table:
Reason as to why you must remain exposed to Equity! | Initial Amount Invested | Annual Return | No. of Years | Final Value of Investment |
Even if the initial investment is half, if annual returns are much better, the final value will be much bigger over a long period of time. Moral of the story: Invest at least part of the amount in Equity to ensure higher returns over a period of time. | 50,000 | 1.14 | 10 | 185,361 |
100,000 | 1.08 | 10 | 215,892 | |
50,000 | 1.14 | 15 | 356,897 | |
100,000 | 1.08 | 15 | 317,217 | |
50,000 | 1.14 | 20 | 687,174 | |
100,000 | 1.08 | 20 | 466,096 |
You'll notice that:
- I've just assumed a one-time investment and have done the calculations for two different sums of initial investments - 50K & 100K.
- Obviously, I've assumed that the guy investing 50K chooses to invest in Equity while the guy investing 100K has chosen debt instruments like fixed deposits
- I've assumed a relatively ordinary level of 14% per annum returns for Equity, whereas many mutual funds have given far superior returns.
- I've assumed truly long-term time horizons.
You'll further notice that beyond 15 years, the guy who initially invested just half the sum initially actually outperforms the other guy.
That's the power of a combination of:
- Long time horizon,
- Compounding and
- Equity investing
If the above results are achieved with just a one-time investment, just imagine what you can achieve with a recurring investment in Equity with a good chunk of your disposable surplus savings!
Happy investing. May all of you grow immensely rich and wealthy beyond your wildest dreams!
Regards,
N
